MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009627161 · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ab7cf2

Impact of a parallel magnetic field on radiation dose beneath thin copper and aluminum foils

2020· article· en· W3009627161 on OpenAlexafffund
Radim Barta, Andrei Ghila, S Rathee, B. G. Fallone, Nicola De Zanche

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Physics & Engineering Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsAlberta Cancer Foundation
KeywordsCopperAluminiumMaterials scienceRadiationField (mathematics)Copper wireMagnetic fieldMetallurgyOpticsPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose : The RF coils for magnetic resonance image guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) may be constructed using thin and/or low-density conductors, along with thinner enclosure materials. This work measures the surface dose increases for lightweight conductors and enclosure materials in a magnetic field parallel to a 6 MV photon beam. Methods : Aluminum and copper foils (9–127 μ m thick), as well as samples of polyimide (17 μ m) and polyester (127 μ m) films are positioned atop a polystyrene phantom. A parallel plate ion chamber embedded into the top of the phantom measures the surface dose in 6 MV photon beam. Measurements (% of dose at the depth of maximum dose) are performed with and without a parallel magnetic field (0.22T at magnet center). Results : In the presence of a magnetic field, the unobstructed surface dose is higher (31.9%D max versus 22.2%D max ). The surface dose is found to increase linearly with thickness for thin (<25 μ m) copper (0.339%D max μ m −1 ) and aluminum (0.116%D max μ m −1 ) foils. In the presence of a magnetic field the slope is lower (copper: 0.16%D max μ m −1 , aluminum: 0.06%D max μ m −1 ). The effect of in-beam foils is reduced due to partial shielding of the surface from contaminant electrons. Copper causes a surface dose increase ≈3 times higher than aluminum of the same thickness, consistent with their relative electron density. Polyester film (127 μ m) increases the surface dose (to 35% D max with field) about as much as a gown (36% D max with field), while the increase with polyimide film (17 μ m) is less than 1% above the open field dose. Conclusions : Thin copper and aluminum conductors increase surface dose by an amount comparable to a hospital gown. Similarly, enclosure materials made of thin polyester or polyimide film increase surface dose by only a few %D max in excess of an unobstructed beam. Based on measurements in this study, in-beam, surface RF coils are feasible for MRIgRT systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressSame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207