Ultrastable Anode Interface Achieved by Fluorinating Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Li Metal Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
All-solid-state Li metal batteries (ASSLMBs) have attracted significant attention because of their high energy density and improved safety. However, the poor stability at the Li anode/solid-state electrolyte (SSE) interface is a long-standing problem that limits the current density and capacity, thus hindering the practical application of ASSLMBs. Herein, fluorination of an Argyrodite Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl) sulfide electrolyte is proposed to enhance the interfacial stability toward the Li metal anode. Because of the condensed and highly fluorinated interface that forms in situ with a self-healing essence, the Li metal symmetric cell employing the fluorinated LPSCl SSE enables ultrastable Li plating/stripping over 250 h at a superhigh current density of 6.37 mA cm –2 and a cutoff capacity of 5 mAh cm –2 . Furthermore, the Li metal treated by the fluorinated LPSCl SSE is demonstrated to deliver good durability and rate capability in full cells. Fluorinating sulfide electrolytes provides a new strategy for realizing high-performance ASSLMBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".