MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009647002 · doi:10.1111/iwj.13322

World Union of Wound Healing Societies Meeting, 2020

2020· editorial· en· W3009647002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Douglas Queen, Keith G Harding

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Wound Journal · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWound careMedicinePassionAbu dhabiEuropean unionHealth carePublic relationsPolitical scienceLawSurgeryPsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As you read this edition of the International Wound Journal (IWJ), the first World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS) meeting of this new decade will just have happened or be taking place in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.This is the 6th WUWHS meeting, which is essentially the Olympics of Wound Healing, taking place every 4 years.It seems like a lifetime since the Toronto meeting in which I played a significant part.Ironically, at that time (2008), the world was dealing with SARS, and here we are again, dealing with the coronavirus.Understanding how it impacted our conference, I wish the organisers for a successful conference.Unfortunately, because of some minor health issues, our Editor will be unable to attend, but look out for our Editor-in-Chief.The objective of WUWHS 2020 is to promote greater collaboration and cooperation of all the Scientific Wound Care Societies around the world who have passion for caring for wounds as their main mission.WUWHS 2020 will offer an extensive scientific programme, including numerous symposia, training sessions, workshops, and focus sessions, with leading international experts in the field of wound management.WUWHS 2020 will be an important moment of cultural unity, an essential scientific round-table and professional exchange for wound care specialists from around the world.With over 50 commercial sponsors, WUWHS 2020 will be one of the biggest wound-related congresses to take place in the United Arab Emirates.With presentations from a significant number of global wound care organisations, this will truly be a world event.The IWJ is proud to be a media partner, and we welcome manuscripts from delegates, presenters, and faculty of the WUWHS 2020 congress if you feel the need to broadcast your research in an international journal with a high impact factor.Founded in 2000, the WUWHS is a global wound care professional association and represents more than 90% of all practicing wound care specialists in the world.Its members are the wound care-related associations from every part of the world, with more than 25 000 emailing contacts.The Association's top priority is to raise and maintain the standard of the medical practice of wound care and improve its practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Wound JournalSame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207