MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009669381 · doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.10.023

Combined Tricuspid and Mitral Versus Isolated Mitral Valve Repair for Severe MR and TR

2020· article· lt· W3009669381 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Mehr, Nicole Karam, Maurizio Taramasso, Taoufik Ouarrak, Steffen Schneider, Philipp Lurz, Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben, Neil Fam, Alberto Pozzoli, Edith Lubos, Peter Boekstegers, Wolfgang Schillinger, Björn Plicht, Holger Eggebrecht, Stephan Baldus, Jochen Senges, Francesco Maisano, Jörg Hausleiter, Kim A. Connelly, Paolo Denti, Davide Schiavi, Marcel Weber, Georg Nickenig, Christian Frerker, Horst Sievert, Laura Vaškelytė, Ulrich Schäfer, Daniel Kalbacher, Florian Deuschl, Karl‐Heinz Kück, Hannes Allessandrini, Christian Besler, Karl‐Philipp Rommel, T. Ruf, Mathias Orban, Thomas J. Stocker, Simon Deseive, Daniel Braun, Michael Näbauer, Steffen Massberg, Raffi Bekeredjian, Christine S. Zuern, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Luigi Biasco

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelt
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersAbbott VascularEdwards LifesciencesMedtronic
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineMitral valveTricuspid valveMitral valve repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations109
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJACC: Cardiovascular InterventionsSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207