MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009730964 · doi:10.33024/jikk.v6i1.2226

AKTIVITAS ANTIMALARIA TANAMAN TALI KUNING (Anamirta cocculus) TERHADAP Plasmodium sp.

2019· article· id· W3009730964 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marhamah Marhamah, Ismalia Husna

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL ILMU KEDOKTERAN DAN KESEHATAN · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMedicinal Plant Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRoyal Society of Tropical Medicine and HygieneRoyal SocietyUniversity of AlbertaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
KeywordsTraditional medicinePhysicsBotanyBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penyakit malaria merupakan salah satu penyebab kematian pada anak-anak dan dewasa khususnya ibu hamil di daerah tropis. Meningkatnya resistensi parasit terhadap obat malaria yang ada merupakan salah satu penyebab tingginya angka morbiditas dan mortalitas. Karena itulah pengembangan obat malaria yang berasal dari tanaman saat ini gencar, salah satunya dengan pemanfaatan tanaman tali kuning (Anamirta cocculus). Mekanisme antimalaria senyawa berberine pada tanaman tali kuning yaitu dengan menghambat aktivitas telomerase Plasmodium sp pada siklus perkembangan plasmodium intraeritrositik terutama pada tahap tropozoid dan skizon. Senyawa dalam bentuk ammonium kuarterner telah diketahui dapat menghambat pertumbuhan Plasmodium dengan cara memblok transport intraseluler kolin. Senyawa kolin diperlukan untuk biosintesis phospholipid dalam pembentukan membran parasit untuk menutup parasitophorous vacuole, sitosol dan berbagai subseluler kompartemen. Pengeblokan transport kolin ini telah digunakan sebagai salah satu strategi pengobatan malaria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL ILMU KEDOKTERAN DAN KESEHATANSame topicMedicinal Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207