MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009823155

Život a dílo českého skladatele Milana Kymličky

2013· dissertation· cs· W3009823155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabriela Pokludová

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This bachelor work deals with the life and work of a Czech composer Milan Kymlicka. The aim of this work is to develop a closer view on his life especially in Czech Republic and in Canada, where he had emigrate because of the political situation. This thesis is divided into several chapters; the main theme is Milan Kymlička's biography, interviews and then finally a smaller sample of his work. The biography of Milan Kymlicka is based on telephone communications and materials, which Kymličkas wife Marie sent to me. Now she lives in Canada. It is about Kymličkas life just before he immigrated to Canada, then about living in Canada and in the end about his returning back to his homeland. The second part of this thesis deals with the interviews - the most important part. Those interviews were led with friends and colleagues of Milan Kymlicka, who provided me a telephone, or a personal interview about their common experience and work experience. The interviews are with Vit Král, Varhan Orchestrovič Bauer, Joseph Pokluda, Juraj Ďurovič. This section also contains an article written by Christopher Dedrick, the orchestrator of Milan Kymlicka, who describes Kymlička in all aspects. The third part is analysing one of the Kymlička's score and approaching the plot and contend of animated series Rupert The Bear....

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207