On Dynamic Mapping and Scheduling of Service Function Chains in SDN/NFV-Enabled Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Software-defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV) together form a promising paradigm that enables the slicing of heterogeneous network resources for agile and efficient service customization. Among other techniques, virtual network function (VNF) mapping and scheduling are crucial to the deployment of SDN/NFV-enabled network services. In this paper, to enhance the performance of service provisioning, dynamic VNF mapping and scheduling are jointly investigated. Specifically, to achieve load balancing with QoS guarantee, we first formulate the VNF mapping and scheduling problem as a mixed integer linear programming (MILP). We then propose a two-stage online algorithm to address the NP-hardness of the MILP. In particular, when new service arrives, we map and schedule the VNFs on a service function chain (SFC) by greedily minimizing the waiting time of VNFs. If the delay requirement cannot be satisfied after the first stage, a delay-aware rescheduling scheme is triggered, in which selected existing VNFs are remapped and rescheduled. The proposed dynamic approach achieves flexible function placement and increases service acceptance ratio. Simulation results are provided to validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".