MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Cloudlet-Dwell-Time Estimation Method for Assisting Vehicular Edge Computing Applications

2019· article· en· W3009839205 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Sun, Azzedine Boukerche, Rodolfo W. L. Coutinho

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloudletComputer scienceDwell timeEdge computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionCloud computingArtificial intelligenceOperating systemMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, to improve the efficiency and safety of the transportation system that is severely affected by the increasing traffic demand, the Internet-of-Vehicles (IoVs)/Vehicular Networks (VNets) have received more and more attention because it can effectively improve the ability of the participants in the transportation system to perceive the traffic environment around them through Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) technique. Moreover, V2X also makes it possible to share computing and storage power between vehicles, which further promotes the development of vehicular edge computing (VEC). However, due to the highly dynamic nature of the VNet's topology, based on the instant traffic flow condition, how to determine whether the vehicles on a given road can form a relatively stable cloudlet with certain computing or data storage capabilities to support certain VEC applications becomes a crucial task that needs to be solved. Therefore, in this paper, we proposed a Cloudlet-Dwell-time (CDT) estimation method to theoretically derive some essential parameters for implementing VEC applications, i.e., the vehicular cloudlet existence probability and its corresponding dwell-time. We further demonstrate the results of the proposed work based on traffic flow data chosen from the England Highways data set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207