State-of-the-art of prefabricated FRP composite jackets for structural repair
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) composites have attracted significant attention in repairing existing and deteriorating structures since the traditional rehabilitation techniques have several limitations in terms of durability, self-weight and complex installation process. Prefabricated FRP composite jackets are the preferred solution in repairing bridge piles located both underwater and above the waterline as they can be easily placed around the damaged pile to form a robust single-piece repair system. The structural continuity of the jacket in such a repair system is critical for effectively utilising its maximum strength. This study presents an extensive review of the current practices and new opportunities for using prefabricated composite jackets for structural repair. Important design considerations to effectively utilise prefabricated FRP composite jackets in repairing structures are presented and analysed. The review also identifies the challenges and highlights the future directions of research to increase the acceptance and use of emerging composite repair systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it