Evaluation of the Activity of Neutrophils and Monocytes in Diabetic Patients With Sepsis, Can Surface Antigens HLA-DR and CD64 Be Useful as Prognostic Factors?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) exhibit alterations in their immune response when infected by several types of micro-organisms. The increased susceptibility of diabetics to infections is particularly related to abnormalities in the function of neutrophils such as chemotaxis, adhesion and intracellular killing, leading to increased mortality rates. Aims of the study were to assess the phagocytic activity and the expression of antigens HLA-DR and CD64 of monocytes and neutrophils in diabetics with sepsis and evaluate their significance as prognostic factors. METHODS: This is an observational prospective study conducted in a tertiary medical center, referring to a population of 51 diabetic patients who were treated for sepsis. Samples of whole blood were received from the selected patients and were evaluated for the expression of surface antigens HLA-DR and CD64 on monocytes and neutrophils, and for their phagocytic activity as well. RESULTS: Alterations in the phagocytic activity were found in the diabetic patients who developed sepsis, and these were addressed as an elevation in the expression of CD64 on monocytes (CD64M), and a reduction in the expression of HLA-DR on monocytes (HLA-DRM) at least in the initial phase of the acute infection. A significant elevation was also noticed in the phagocytosis rate of both neutrophils and monocytes on day of admission. Survivors had higher rates of both CD64 and HLA-DR on monocytes when compared to non-survivors. No correlation was found between glycemic control, values of inflammatory markers on admission, phagocytosis rate and the survival of diabetics with sepsis. A reduced expression of CD64O, HLA-DRM and the co-expression of CD64/HLA-DR on monocytes in the initial phase of sepsis and poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 8.5) was found. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study of diabetic patients with sepsis the phagocytic activity of neutrophils and monocytes is elevated at the initial phase of an acute infection and only the values of CD64 and HLA-DR on monocytes were significantly related to outcome. Further evaluation of these results with large prospective studies is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".