Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment persister culturellement et linguistiquement lorsque la migration fait de nous des individus doublement minoritaires? C'est la question qui est posee dans cet ouvrage qui se penche sur une presence kabyle dans un Montreal multiculturel. La langue berbere, le tamazight, constitue le symbole de la contestation pour la reconnaissance officielle en Algerie ainsi qu'un referent identitaire essentiel et sensible en contexte migratoire. La communaute kabyle quebecoise qui ne cesse de s'agrandir depuis le debut des annees 90 s'organise autour d'activites socioculturelles et politiques. Bien qu'il soit tot pour trancher sur sort de l'« amazighite » version quebecoise, nous pouvons nous interroger sur les manieres d'envisager la poursuite de la lutte pour le maintien de leur culture, en Algerie comme au Quebec. Assisterons-nous a la naissance d'une culture kabyle typiquement quebecois? L'intention n'est pas de repondre a cette question mais d'emettre quelques hypotheses sur l'avenir de cette population dans la Belle Province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".