MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009947373 · doi:10.1093/jbcr/iraa024.300

714 IL-6 and Soluble IL-6 Receptor – Two Sides of the Same Coin

2020· article· en· W3009947373 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Rehou, Abdikarim Abdullahi, Marc G. Jeschke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Burn Care & Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTotal body surface areaBurn injuryBody surface areaMann–Whitney U testInternal medicineExact testGastroenterologyReceptorCytokineInterleukin 6Surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Interleukin (IL)-6 is a multifunctional cytokine that has both a pro- and anti-inflammatory role. In many studies, IL-6 has been shown to increase rapidly after burn injury and is associated with poor outcomes. IL-6 can signal via its soluble IL-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) and is referred to as trans-signaling, which is regarded as the pro-inflammatory pathway. The role of sIL-6R post-burn injury has not yet been explored. We hypothesized that patients with a lower ratio of IL-6 to sIL-6R would have worse outcomes. Methods Patients admitted to our burn centre within 7 days of injury were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on IL-6 and sIL-6R levels measured within the first 30 days post-burn injury. Patients were in the high ratio group if their IL-6:sIL-6R ratio was ≥ 0.185. Clinical outcomes included organ biomarkers, morbidities, and hospital length of stay. Groups were compared using Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher’s exact test as appropriate; a P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results We studied 104 patients, mean age 51 ± 18 years and 24 ± 17% total body surface area (TBSA) burn. There were 49 patients categorized with a low IL-6:sIL-6R ratio and 55 patients with a high IL-6:sIL-6R ratio. Patients in the high IL-6:sIL-6R ratio group had a significantly greater TBSA burn and a significantly greater proportion of patients with inhalation injury (p< 0.05). Levels of sIL-6R were not significantly different among the low and high group (770 ± 264 pg/mL vs. 798 ± 268 pg/mL respectively; p=0.601). However, levels of IL-6 were significantly higher in patients with a high IL-6:sIL-6R ratio (37 IQR 19–97 pg/mL vs. 567 IQR 273–916 pg/mL; p< 0.0001). Mortality was significantly greater in the high IL-6:sIL-6R ratio group (2% vs. 27%; p< 0.001). Conclusions Interestingly, patients with a higher ratio of IL-6:sIL-6R had significantly greater mortality. Using sIL-6R as a marker for the proinflammatory immune response, we expected patients with a lower IL-6:sIL-6R ratio to have poor outcomes which are typically associated with a hyperinflammatory or exaggerated immune response. However, the absolute value of sIL-6R did not differ. This suggests that classic signaling of IL-6 via its membrane bound receptor, with an anti-inflammatory function, is an important factor. Applicability of Research to Practice The opposing pro- and anti-inflammatory function of IL-6 through trans- and classic signaling is contingent on the ratios expressed. The demonstrated increase in classic signaling highlights the importance of measuring both IL-6 and sIL-6R in future studies. Additionally, it lays the foundation for potential precision medicine approaches to selectively block specific signaling pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Burn Care & ResearchSame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207