Online identification of nonlinear systems using neo-fuzzy supported brain emotional learning network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an online algorithm for identifying the nonlinear dynamical systems and is termed as neo-fuzzy based brain emotional learning plant identifier (NFBELPI). As the name suggests, the proposed identifier is a combination of brain emotional learning network and neo-fuzzy neurons. The integration of these two networks is realized in a way that retains the characteristics of both the networks while an enhanced performance is achieved at the same time. Precisely, the orbitofrontal cortex section of the brain emotional learning network is fused with neo-fuzzy neurons with a view to equip it with more knowledge than does the amygdala section possesses. The proposed identifier accepts n -input and m -output samples to generate an estimate of the plant output and employs a brain emotional learning algorithm to lower the estimation error by adjusting a total of (( n + m + 1) × p ) + ( n + m + 2) weights, with p being the number of neo-fuzzy neurons. The proposal is validated in a MATLAB programming environment using a simulated Narendra dynamical plant as well as against the data recorded from real forced duffing oscillator. Comparison with a brain emotional learning plant identifier (BELPI) and some other state-of-the art identifiers in terms of root mean squared error (RMSE) criterion reveals the improved performance of the proposed identifier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it