Dynamic Response of Latticed Shell and Its Steel Column Supports under Impact Load
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lattice shell structure is widely adopted in large-span spatial structures (LSSSs). Under impact load, the steel column supports have a great impact on the working performance of the lattice shell structure. To ensure the impact resistance of the structure, this paper establishes a finite-element model of a single-layer latticed shell with steel column supports, and applies the model to analyze the nonlinear dynamic response of the latticed shell structure under the lateral impact from a heavy vehicle. In addition, the authors examined the influence of three factors, namely, peak impact load, lateral stiffness of support and number of impact points, over the latticed shell structure under the said impact. The results show that: except for the impacted support and rods connected to the support, the entire latticed shell structure is basically in an elastic state. Overall, the working performance of the latticed shell structure is not damaged by the impact load, that is, the structure still enjoys satisfactory strength and stability, with no dynamic instability. Hence, the latticed shell structure boats good working performance under impact load.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it