Potential of Xylanases to Reduce the Viscosity of Micro/Nanofibrillated Bleached Kraft Pulp
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The generally high viscosity of micro/nanofibrillated cellulose limits its applications in cream and fluid products. A bleached softwood Kraft (BSK) pulp was refined with increasing energy (500–2500 kWh t –1 ) to produce micro/nanofibrillated cellulose (MNBSK). Subsequent xylanase treatment was shown to influence the viscosity, gel point, aspect ratio, and fiber surface morphology of the MNBSK. It was apparent that the accessibility to xylanases was increased even at low refining energies (500 kWh t –1 ). Depending on the initial degree of cellulose fibrillation, xylanase treatment decreased the viscosity of the MNBSK from 4190–2030 to 681–243 Pa·s at a shear rate of 0.01 s –1, corresponding to the reduction in the aspect ratio from 183–296 to 163–194. It was likely that the xylanases were predominantly acting on the xylan present on the fiber surfaces, reducing the cross-linking points on the cellulose fibers and consequently resulting in the reduction in MNBSK viscosity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".