MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010013019

MTABS Analyses of Chi-square Cross-tabulations at ABSEL

2020· article· en· W3010013019 on OpenAlexaff
John Dickinson

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopularityStatistical hypothesis testingExperiential learningTest (biology)Computer scienceStatistical analysisReliability (semiconductor)StatisticsMathematicsPsychologyMathematics educationSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cross-tabulation with its accompanying chi-square statistical hypothesis test of independence is among the most commonly applied types of analysis.  This popularity holds for research published in the conference proceedings of the Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning (ABSEL), Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning (aka Bernie Keys Library, BKL).  Recently, Dickinson (2019, 2017, 2016) has developed a procedure–Moves To And Beyond Significance (MTABS)–for measuring the reliability of that statistical test.  In light of their popularity at ABSEL, the present study MTABS analyzes several ABSEL cross-tabulations, illustrating a spectrum of results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.833

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conferenceSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207