MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010019208 · doi:10.1002/aelm.201901431

Fully R2R‐Printed Carbon‐Nanotube‐Based Limitless Length of Flexible Active‐Matrix for Electrophoretic Display Application

2020· article· en· W3010019208 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Electronic Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
KeywordsMaterials scienceThin-film transistorCarbon nanotubeFabricationActive matrixInkwellNanotechnologyRoll-to-roll processingFlexible displayTransistorElectrophoresisOptoelectronicsDiodePolymerPrinted electronicsOLEDVoltageComposite materialElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A limitless‐length flexible active‐matrix implies that virtually any surface can be rendered into an interactive medium when laminated with electrophoretic or organic light‐emitting diode sheets. However, performance, cost, and size limitations of current fabrication technologies and semiconducting materials, typically utilized in thin film transistor (TFT) active matrices (TFT‐AMs), have hindered progress, thus preventing the realization of fully printed TFT‐AMs on a plastic roll. A new high‐purity semiconducting single‐walled carbon nanotube (s‐SWCNT) ink is prepared by first isolating 99.9% pure s‐SWCNTs via conjugated polymer extraction, and then utilizing a ligand‐exchange method to formulate a novel hydrophilic gravure‐compatible semiconducting ink. Based on the s‐SWCNT ink, a fully additive manufacturing process using roll‐to‐roll (R2R) gravure printing enables the fabrication of a flexible TFT‐AM, overcoming performance, cost, and size limitations. TFT‐AMs with 10 to 40 PPI resolution where average mobility of 0.23 ± 0.12 cm 2 V −1 s −1 , average on–off ratio of 10 4.1 , and threshold voltage variation of ±13% are attained. As a proof of concept, an inexpensive and flexible electrophoretic display is demonstrated by simply laminating an electrophoretic sheet onto the R2R gravure‐printed s‐SWCNT‐based TFT‐AM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it