Finite‐time adaptive fault‐tolerant control for rigid spacecraft attitude tracking
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper provides a new solution for the finite‐time attitude maneuvers of rigid spacecraft. Uncertainties involving unknown inertial parameters, external disturbances and actuator failures are taken into account. With an effort to achieve attitude tracking despite the impact of uncertainties, a non‐singular terminal sliding mode (NTSM) manifold consisting of attitude errors and angular velocity errors is first constructed. After that, a simple but efficient adaptive updating law is derived to estimate the upper bound of the lumped unknown function in the derivative of sliding surface. Combining NTSM technology and pure adaptive control, a chattering‐free fault‐tolerant controller is presented. The premise assumptions on uncertainties in most of the existing achievements are eliminated, which makes the controller less constrained and more practical. The rigorous proof of finite‐time stability is provided and the convergent regions of tracking errors are explicitly expressed. Finally, numerical simulation is conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme and the comparison experiments with relevant literature demonstrate the satisfactory performances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it