Philosophy in Austen’s Pump Room: How Enlightened Tolerance Became Disgust
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article reads Immanuel Kant’s “Perpetual Peace” (1795) alongside Jane Austen’s Emma (1815) and Persuasion (1817) to show how national character—a concept grounded in shared taste through culture rather than territory—could be maintained in a rapidly globalizing world. Kant proposed tolerance as a way to allow travellers to move across the globe peacefully without having to abandon their national character. Austen’s Emma portrays taste as able to do the political work necessary to stabilize country house culture by linking the enactment of taste in the Highbury community to something like Kantian tolerance. As Persuasion demonstrates, however, tolerance’s toothlessness becomes apparent when the national community is detached from territory. By replacing tolerance with disgust, Persuasion’s mobile community can protect itself from those who might degrade it. Austen’s marriage of taste and disgust places each individual who passes the taste test into a realm of friendship with those of like mind, making this community the bearer and defender of the English way of life wherever it may be located geographically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.060 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".