MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010233424 · doi:10.47119/ijrp10047122020995

Predictors of Learning Difficulties in General Mathematics

2020· article· en· W3010233424 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C Charlyn Satira, W Rommel Otero

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Research Publications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyCorrelationRegression analysisMathematics educationQuarter (Canadian coin)Academic achievementDevelopmental psychologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed at determining the relationship of learning difficulties along with sex, age, parents’/guardians’ highest educational attainment, SES, previous Mathematics grade and math anxiety. Multiple regression was used to examine the predictive strength of the independent variables to learning difficulties. The respondents were purposively selected i.e. only those whose academic grade for the first quarter is below 80. It is revealed that there is a weak correlation between learning difficulties and predictors. Each predictor did not also show a significant correlation to learning difficulties. This study provided the avenue to conduct another research looking into identifying some other variables and their predictive effects on the learners’ learning difficulties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.274
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Research PublicationsSame topicMathematics Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207