MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010261226 · doi:10.1055/a-1038-0232

Ergebnismessung in der Hüft- und Knieendoprothetik – Empfehlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Endoprothetik (AE)

2020· article· de· W3010261226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jörg Lützner, Andreas Niemeier, Tilmann Calließ, Philipp von Roth

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie · 2020
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWOMACMedicineOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyQuality of life (healthcare)PromAlternative medicineObstetricsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abkürzungsverzeichnis AE: Adverse Event COS: Core Outcome Set EPRD: Endoprothesenregister Deutschland EPZ: Zertifiziertes EndoProthetikZentrum EQ-5D: EuroQoL (European Quality of Life) – 5 Dimensions GCP: Good clinical Practice HOOS: Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score ICHOM: International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement IQTIG: Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen KOOS: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score OHS: Oxford Hip Score OKS: Oxford Knee Score OMERACT: Outcome Measures in Rheumatology OP: Operation PROM: Patient-reported Outcome Measures SAE: Serious adverse Event SF-12: Short Form 12 Health Survey SF-36: Short Form 36 Health Survey VAS: visuelle Analogskala WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Orthopädie und UnfallchirurgieSame topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207