MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010263815 · doi:10.1117/12.2544304

Enhanced optical absorption in droplet-based microfluidics for on-chip polymerase chain reactions

2020· article· en· W3010263815 on OpenAlexaff
Isaac Spotts, Camille A. Leclerc, Christopher M. Collier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrofluidicsAbsorption (acoustics)Lab-on-a-chipMaterials sciencePhotonicsOptoelectronicsChipPenetration depthOptical fiberNanotechnologyOpticsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microfluidic technologies and on-chip optical components have advanced such that on-chip sensing of minute chemical and molecular compounds is possible, e.g., detection of gases, pathogens, and DNA. Such DNA analyses require purification and amplification to maximize sensitivity. A common method for amplification of a DNA segment is polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which amplifies DNA segments through temperature changes in an assay process. As such, there is great interest in optofluidic lab-on-a-chip PCR methods. However, developments are limited due to challenges in optically driven temperature fluctuations. These challenges arise when the microfluidic samples are smaller than the optical penetration depth of the incident light and only minimal absorption is achieved. To overcome these challenges, this work presents a bio-photonic approach to the PCR method which utilizes infrared (IR) radiation with whispering gallery mode (WGM) waves. The WGM waves greatly increase the interaction length in the microdroplet, allowing smaller (and scalable) dimensions. This improved interaction length occurs because the applied IR radiation is confined along the perimeter of the microdroplet and its surrounding medium. The operation is modelled with finite-different time-domain electromagnetic simulations, comparing current optical heating with the presented technique. These simulations are validated through an experimental analysis with a thermal camera measuring temperature fluctuations. Ultimately, the presented approach is shown to greatly increase scalability in PCR lab-on-a-chip systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrowetting and Microfluidic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207