MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3010400380 · doi:10.1161/circ.141.suppl_1.p176

Abstract P176: Associations of Gestational Lipids and Apolipoproteins With Pregnancy Outcomes: The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study

2020· article· en· W3010400380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amanda M. Perak, Alan Kuang, Nicola Lancki, Darwin R. Labarthe, Svati H. Shah, Lynn P. Lowe, John T. Wilkins, William L. Lowe, Donald M. Lloyd‐Jones, Denise Scholtens

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyObstetricsGestational diabetesGestationPreeclampsiaOdds ratioGestational ageSmall for gestational ageApolipoprotein BInternal medicineCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Gestational hyperlipidemia has traditionally been considered physiologic and benign, but the significance of inter-individual variation in lipid levels for maternal-fetal health are poorly understood. We examined associations of gestational lipids and apolipoproteins with adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Methods: Data from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study were analyzed, including 1,813 mother-child dyads from 9 field centers in 6 countries: US (25%), Barbados (24%), UK (20%), China (16%), Thailand (8%), and Canada (7%). Fasting lipids and apolipoproteins were directly measured at a mean of 28 (range 23-34) weeks’ gestation. Cord blood was collected at delivery, neonatal anthropometrics were measured within 72 hours, and medical records were abstracted for obstetric outcomes. Logistic regression was utilized to test associations of lipids and apolipoproteins (per +1 SD; log-transformed if skewed) with pregnancy outcomes, adjusted for center, demographics, and maternal covariates such as BMI, blood pressure, and glycemia. Results: See Table for lipid and apolipoprotein levels in pregnant mothers. In fully adjusted models ( Table ), 1 SD higher log-triglycerides (i.e., ~2.7-fold higher triglyceride level) in late pregnancy was significantly associated with higher odds for preeclampsia (OR 1.53 [95% CI, 1.15-2.05]), large for gestational age infant (1.42 [1.21-1.67]), and infant insulin sensitivity <10 th percentile (1.25 [1.03-1.50]), but not with unplanned primary cesarean section or infant sum of skinfolds >90 th percentile. There were no significant associations of maternal HDL-C, LDL-C, or log-ApoB/A1 ratio with any outcome. Conclusion: Triglyceride levels in the latter half of pregnancy were uniquely associated with both maternal risks (preeclampsia) and neonatal risks (large for gestational age and insulin resistance), even after adjustment for maternal BMI, blood pressure, and glycemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→