MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characters of Deformation and Surface Quality and Cutter Wearing at High-Speed Cutting

2020· article· en· W3010401191 on OpenAlexaff
Hu Ping An, Zhi Yuan Rui, R. Mahalinga Iyer

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceChipBrittlenessSurface roughnessChip formationDeformation (meteorology)MetallurgyWeldingCeramicCutting toolSurface finishComposite materialMachiningMechanical engineeringTool wearEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the impact of cutting speed and feed amount on cutting deformation and surface quality and cutter wear have been studied by the test of high manganese steel cutting with metal ceramic tool at high speed. The results show that it is feasible by cutting high manganese steel with cermet tool at high-speed cutting (HSC). Chip changes into succession segment from band in macrostate. Sawteeth can be seen on the top surface of chip while high temperature feature in burning color and cold welding form appear on the bottom of the chip. The model of surface roughness built can be used to predict surface quality at HSC, and provided cutting optimized parameters scheme. Further research indicates that high-speed cutting has its special deformation mechanism and plastic chips exhibit hot brittleness which provides a favorable condition for solving the chip breaking problem in the cutting of high manganese steel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207