MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010476016 · doi:10.1109/tcc.2019.2910111

Survivable IaaS Management with SDN

2020· article· en· W3010476016 on OpenAlexafffund
Heli Amarasinghe, Abdallah Jarray, Ahmed Karmouch

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingBackupDistributed computingVirtual networkComputer networkProvisioningTestbedFault toleranceSurvivabilityNetwork managementSoftware-defined networkingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fault-tolerance, survivability and resiliency in wide area networks have long been prominent research topics. With the popularity of the cloud service model and the novel software defined networking (SDN) paradigm, there is renewed interest in failure protection and restoration in network service provisioning. In this work, we propose a novel protection and restoration based virtual network management scheme to enhance fault tolerance in infrastructure-as-a-service, deployed over networked cloud infrastructure. The networked cloud infrastructure is composed of multiple geographically distributed datacenters that are interconnected with SDN. Both compute and network resources are allocated by formulating the virtual network embedding problem as an integer linear program. A shared backup virtual link protection mechanism and a reactive traffic engineering network failure restoration algorithm are proposed and integrated with the framework to provide recovery from unexpected link failures. We implemented the framework on an emulated SDN testbed and evaluated the performances of the algorithms during single and multiple link failures. Experimental results demonstrate trade-offs of the proposed approaches and their applicability in different application scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cloud ComputingSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207