Práticas nepantleras da engenharia e os desafios de se formarem engenheiros/as capazes de aplicá-las e aprimorá-las
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O conceito de nepantla refere-se ao lugar da reconstrução de nossa compreensão sobre nós mesmos/as, os/as outros/as e o mundo. Lugar, assim, da possibilidade de se gestar e trazer à luz um ordenamento sociotécnico diferente daquele atualmente hegemônico, que produz desempoderamento dos grupos populares, injustiça social e degradação ambiental. Nas últimas décadas, desenvolveram-se distintas práticas de engenharia que podem ser aplicadas nesse lugar, ou, mesmo, podem emulá-lo. Contudo, a reflexão sobre a formação do/a profissional capaz de aplicar essas práticas permanece pouco desenvolvida. Neste trabalho, após fundamentar a urgência de nepantla e apresentar o que é esse lugar fronteiriço, ilustraremos abordagens da engenharia que conseguem ocupá-lo e emulá-lo, esboçando, então, atividades pedagógicas que, em acréscimo àquelas desenvolvidas no Brasil para a formação do/a engenheiro/a educador(a), são capazes de formar esse/a engenheiro/a nepantlero.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".