Stress fields acting during lithosphere breakup above a melting mantle: A case example in West Greenland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We characterize and map the stress fields acting during plate breakup along the West Greenland volcanic margin. The determination of interpolated stress fields is based on an inversion of fault-slip data sets and magma-driven fractures, crosscutting mainly an exposed inner seaward-dipping basaltic wedge (i.e., SDRi: inner Seaward Dipping Reflectors). This SDRi is segmented along-strike, with differently oriented segments. Relative chronology of stress fields is inferred from published age results on oriented dykes. We identify two distinct tectonic episodes (P1 and P2) with a P1–P2 change over at ~ 54 Ma, i.e. during magnetic chron C24R. P1 is syn-magmatic and purely extensional. It is associated with the major crustal stretching event affecting the margin. P1 probably acted as early as the Late Palaeocene. This stress field was first homogeneous with the minimum principal stress σ3 trending ~ N060E, defining a P1A stage. During development of the SDRi, σ3 locally reoriented to become orthogonal to each margin segment and, thus, to the continentward-dipping detachment faults bounding the SDRi (P1B). P1 is coeval with lithosphere breakup and is associated with an extension orthogonal to the Labrador–Baffin axis, which is inherited from the Mesozoic. A regional and radical change of σ3 to a ~ NS trend takes place during P2, which follows on immediately from P1. P2 is also syn-magmatic. It is associated with only minor extension. σ3 runs parallel to the North American (NAM)/Greenland (GR) kinematic vector from C24R to C13. We establish therefore that the minimum horizontal stress σ3 for P1 and P2 is parallel to the relative displacement of Greenland related to NAM but not to its absolute displacement during the Tertiary. Taking into account those results as well as variations in magma chemistry from P1 to P2, we suggest that tectonic stresses at a volcanic margin could arise from the local dynamics of the melting mantle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".