Cardiac CapZ regulation during acute exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose Exercise requires a rapid cardiac response to maintain cardiovascular function. CapZ is a critical stress-response protein in cardiac myocytes. While its role in the pathological stress response has been explored, its part in the physiological response to exercise is unknown. This study examined CapZ regulation during acute exercise and sought to determine its importance in the cardiac response to exercise. Methods Wildtype or cardiac CapZ-deficient transgenic mice were subjected to 20 min of swimming, or exhaustive exercise protocols. Time to exhaustion was a measurement of exercise capacity. Following submaximal exercise, cardiac myofilaments were isolated and probed for CapZ and key regulatory proteins. Myofilament function was assessed using an actomyosin MgATPase assay and total protein phosphorylation quantified with ProQ Diamond staining. Myofilament regulatory proteins following submaximal exercise were quantified by immunoblotting. Results Total myofilament CapZ was unaffected by exercise but increased total CapZIP and decreased phosphorylated CapZIP indicated weakened CapZ-actin interaction. CapZ-deficient transgenic myofilaments lacked changes in CapZIP but BAG3 increased 10%. Time to exhaustion was lower in CapZ-deficient mice in both swimming and running protocols. Actomyosin MgATPase activity was maintained in wildtype mice and impaired with CapZ deficiency. Exercise increased the phosphorylation of several myofilament proteins in wildtype mice but not transgenic animals. Exercise-dependent Increases in myofilament PKC-α and -ε were mitigated in CapZ-deficient mice. Tcap levels decreased 39 ± 8% in CapZ-deficient myofilaments with exercise and leiomodin 2 increased 78 ± 28% in wildtype myofilaments. Conclusions Cardiac CapZ is a critical player in the physiological response to exercise. CapZ-actin binding is rapidly altered with exercise. Decreased cardiac CapZ limits exercise capacity, impairs myofilament regulation, and leads to a less stable contractile apparatus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".