Technology Foresight Analysis Sebagai Metodologi Dalam Pertimbangan Pengembangan Kawasan Cagar Budaya
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metodologi dalam penelitian kawasan cagar budaya sangat potensial untuk dikembangkan, terutama dalam pendekatan-pendekatan non fisik seperti partisipasi masyarakat. Aspek anthropologi yang dipotret dengan bingkai kajian etnografi, aspek ekonomi dan lingkungan aspek modal budaya dan berlanjutan. Dalam pengembangan cagar budaya, sangat diperlukan aspek-aspek yang akan mendukung masa depan cagar budaya. Pengetahuan terhadap aspek-aspek tersebut yang dibingkai dalam analisis foresight yang dikembangkan diharapkan bisa menjadi pertimbangan dirumuskan kebijakan-kebijakan yang dapat mendukung pengembangan kawasan cagar budaya ke depan. Keywords : Foresight Analysis, Cagar Budaya , Pengembangan Metode
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it