MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010680160 · doi:10.1180/mgm.2019.80

Yarzhemskiite, K[B<sub>5</sub>O<sub>7</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>]⋅H<sub>2</sub>O, a new mineral from the Chelkar salt dome, Western Kazakhstan

2019· article· en· W3010680160 on OpenAlex
Igor V. Pekov, Natalia V. Zubkova, О. В. Коротченкова, I. I. Chaikovskiy, Vasiliy O. Yapaskurt, Н. В. Чуканов, Dmitry I. Belakovskiy, Inna S. Lykova, Sergey N. Britvin, D.Y. Pushcharovsky

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMohs scale of mineral hardnessCrystallographyHaliteElectron microprobeMonoclinic crystal systemChemical compositionMineralogyOrthorhombic crystal systemChemistryIsostructuralMineralCrystal structureQuartzAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceGypsumMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The new mineral yarzhemskiite, K[B 5 O 7 (OH) 2 ]⋅H 2 O, was found in a halite–sylvite evaporite rock at the Chelkar salt dome, Western Kazakhstan Region, Kazakhstan. It is also associated with carnallite, polyhalite, gypsum, strontioginorite, satimolite and quartz. Yarzhemskiite occurs as separate thick tabular, short prismatic or equant crystals up to 0.5 mm × 0.7 mm × 1 mm and grains having irregular outlines up to 1 mm × 1.5 mm × 2 mm. The mineral is transparent, colourless, with vitreous lustre. It is brittle, the Mohs’ hardness is ca 2½. Cleavage is perfect on {100}. D meas is 2.13(1) and D calc is 2.112 g cm –3 . Yarzhemskiite is optically biaxial (+), α = 1.484(2), β = 1.508(2), γ = 1.546(2), 2V meas = 75(10)° and 2V calc = 80°. Chemical composition (wt.%, electron microprobe, H 2 O was calculated by stoichiometry) is: Na 2 O 0.01, K 2 O 17.84, CaO 0.07, B 2 O 3 67.21, H 2 O calc 13.91, total 99.04. The empirical formula based on 10 O atoms per formula unit is K 0.98 B 5.005 O 7 (OH) 2 ⋅H 2 O. Yarzhemskiite is monoclinic, P 2 1 / c , a = 9.47340(18), b = 7.52030(16), c = 11.4205(2) Å, β = 97.3002(17)°, V = 807.03(3) Å 3 and Z = 4. The strongest reflections of the powder XRD pattern [ d ,Å( I ,%)( hkl )] are: 9.39(86)(100), 4.696(41)(200), 3.296(18)( $\bar{1}$ 13), 3.130(19)(022, 300), 2.935(42)(220), 2.898(100)( $\bar{3}$ 02, $\bar{2}$ 21, 310), 2.832(56)(004) and 1.867(18)( $\bar{2}$ 25). The crystal structure was solved based on single-crystal X-ray diffraction data, R 1 = 3.36%. The structure contains infinite chains built by boron-centred polyhedra. The basic structural unit of the chain is a double ring B 5 O 7 (OH) 2 consisting of one BO 4 tetrahedron and four BO 3 triangles. K + cations centre ten-fold polyhedra which form, together with the borate chains [B 5 O 7 (OH) 2 ] – ∝ , layers linked with each other only via H bonds. The mineral is named in honour of the Russian geologist, petrologist and mineralogist Yakov Yakovlevich Yarzhemskii (1901–?), a specialist in petrology of evaporite rocks and mineralogy and genesis of boron deposits related to evaporites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it