MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010727714 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100311

The impact of gender discrimination on a Woman's Mental Health

2020· article· en· W3010727714 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Simone N. Vigod, Paula A. Rochon

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of TorontoWomen's College Hospital
KeywordsMedicineMental healthPsychosocialStressorInequalityHealth equityPsychiatryGerontologyDemographic economicsPublic healthNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes that health outcomes are unequal for people, both across and within countries, with inequity especially disadvantaging women across their lifespan [1]. The overt social and economic inequalities more commonly experienced by women, such as lower rates of schooling and employment, less pay for similar jobs, under representation in leadership positions, and the higher level of psychosocial stressors and problems, from caregiving burden to intimate partner violence, all contribute to these disparities [2].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.231
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicSex and Gender in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207