Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Ameliorates Cognitive Impairment in Stroke Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the effects of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement on cognitive function in subjects with poststroke cognitive impairment using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: We included 60 patients with a first-ever stroke for 3 months and a diagnosis of cognitive impairment who were randomized 1:1 to receive either rhGH subcutaneously or placebo injection for 6 months. All subjects were required to receive the same rehabilitative therapy program. Both groups were subjected to pretreatment and posttreatment neuropsychological assessment using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, serum neurotrophic factors, biomarkers of glucose and lipid metabolism, and functional magnetic resonance imaging during 6 months of the study period. The pattern of brain activity was determined by examining the functional connectivity and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) of blood oxygen level dependent signal. RESULTS: Forty-three (82.7%) completed the study. Treatment with rhGH reduced levels of triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol but did not significantly altered plasma concentrations of glucose and glycated hemoglobin. We found a significant increase in serum insulin-like growth factor 1 levels (32.6%; P < 0.001) in the rhGH-treated group compared with that in the controls. After 6 months of rhGH treatment, mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment score improved from 16.31 (5.32) to 21.19 (6.54) (P < 0.001). The rhGH group showed significant increased area of activation with increased ALFF values in the regions of the frontal lobe, putamen, temporal lobe, and thalamus (P < 0.05), relative to the baseline conditions. The correlation analysis revealed that the ALFF and functional connectivity of default mode network was positively correlated with the ΔMoCA score and ΔIGF-1 levels; that is, the more the scale score increased, the higher the functional connection strength. No undesirable adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The rhGH replacement has a significant impact on global and domain cognitive functions in poststroke cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".