MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010742418 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.2979434

Delay Minimization for Massive MIMO Assisted Mobile Edge Computing

2020· article· en· W3010742418 on OpenAlexafffund
Ming Zeng, Wanming Hao, Octavia A. Dobre, H. Vincent Poor

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMobile edge computingComputer scienceComputational complexity theoryBase stationMIMOMathematical optimizationConvex optimizationWirelessChannel state informationResource allocationOptimization problemMinificationEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionIterative methodChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmRegular polygonComputer networkMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile edge computing (MEC) has been envisioned as a promising technology for enhancing the computational capacities of mobile devices, by enabling computational task offloading. In this article, we employ massive multiple-input multiple-output methods to facilitate offloading in MEC. Our objective is to minimize the maximum delay for offloading and computing among the users, which requires a joint allocation of wireless and computational resources. Both perfect and imperfect channel state information (CSI) are considered. Under perfect CSI, we derive a semi-closed-form solution for the formulated problem. Under imperfect CSI, since the formulated problem is non-convex, we transform it into a convex one using a successive convex approximation technique and propose an iterative algorithm to solve it. Presented numerical results show the benefits of having a large number of antennas at the base station, and the necessity of performing joint radio and computational resource allocation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207