Geomechanical Characterization and Modeling in the Montney for Hydraulic Fracturing Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Geomechanics plays a significant role in hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation and in the interaction between hydraulic fractures and natural fractures, especially in unconventional reservoirs. This paper provides a detailed description of a geomechanical characterization and modeling study for evaluating the impact of geomechanics on completions and hydraulic fracturing stimulations optimization in the Montney resource play, Canada. Following an integrated workflow, 1D mechanical earth models (MEM) for ten wells were constructed in the study area. These 1D MEMs include elastic and strength properties, pore pressure, direction and magnitude of in-situ stresses. Extensive rock mechanics core testing data were used to calibrate the elastic and strength properties. Pore pressure and fracture closure pressure data from diagnostic fracture injection tests were also available to calibrate pore pressure and minimum in-situ stress. Maximum horizontal stress was constrained by modeling wellbore stability and matching it with caliper logs and wellbore stability features on wellbore image. A 3D mechanical earth model was subsequently constructed using a 3D geological model, the 1D MEMs, and seismic inversion data. Elastic properties from seismic inversion were used to populate mechanical properties in the 3D model. In-situ stresses were numerically simulated to account for the impact of faults and structural and mechanical property variation on in-situ stress distribution. The geomechanical analysis shows that there is a decreasing trend in Young’s modulus from upper Montney to lower Montney while Poisson’s ratio is relatively constant in the Montney. The pore pressure in some parts of the field is high and varies across the field. Stress regime is predominantly strike-slip with relatively large stress anisotropy, and this has implications on the hydraulic fracture network that would be simulated, shearing of natural fractures and the stimulated reservoir volume. Rock elastic and strength properties, pore pressure, and in-situ stresses were found to be heterogenous across the whole field. The relatively large variation in pore pressure in the study area and the structural complexities have large impact on the distribution of stresses. Faults alter the stress distribution locally and could affect hydraulic fracture propagation. Hydraulic fracture simulations were subsequently performed, and the geometry of the simulated hydraulic fractures and the stimulated reservoir volume were validated with microseismic events. The effects of geomechanics on fracture geometry and ultimately reservoir production were evaluated. Because of the significant impact of geomechanics on hydraulic fracturing, it is critical to characterize and model geomechanics accurately. This paper provides a comprehensive approach and application to a field in the Montney, showcasing the integrated method of geomechanical characterization and hydraulic fracture simulation and production modeling using various data. The analysis provides an interrelationship among geomechanical parameters, microseismicity and stimulated reservoir volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".