MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010800036

The Structure and Kinematics of Protoclusters

2004· article· en· W3010800036 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Di Francesco

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsPhysicsClassical mechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embedded clusters produce the greatest numbers of stars within our Galaxy but the process by which clusters themselves form is not well understood. The structures and kinematics of the very youngest embedded clusters, i.e., `protoclusters' with ages < 10^6 yr, should provide needed insight. To gauge their utility in this regard, we examine recent observations of a nearby protocluster in Ophiuchus. Near-infrared images of the Oph A core reveal numerous young objects but the small sky coverages or low sensitivities to highly-embedded objects attained so far limit their usefulness in revealing cluster structure. Submillimeter continuum images do reveal the most embedded objects but their relatively low resolutions preclude effective comparisons with near-infrared images. Interferometric millimeter observations of N2H+ 1-0 show a strong spatial coincidence with the submillimeter continuum objects, and can be used to trace radial velocities of this population at least. The Oph A filament shows small radial velocity dispersions, e.g., ~0.2 km/s, at odds with predictions from some theories of cluster formation. The upcoming C2D and COMPLETE surveys of nearby star-forming molecular clouds will produce the sensitive, wide-field data needed to understand better the cluster formation process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Theories and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207