MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010827326

Il baule della sposa: amuleti, simboli e ideali in una tomba di Este romana

2018· article· it· W3010827326 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cecilia Rossi

Bibliographic record

VenueRivista di Archeologia · 2018
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrave goodsContext (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)HistoryArtHumanitiesAncient historyArchaeologyEthnology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is focused on a Roman cremation burial coming from Este (Padova – North-eastern Italy) dated to the third quarter of the 1st century AD. Discovered at the beginning of the Twentieth century and never published in a systematic way, the grave goods of the tomb are now preserved in the National Archeological Museum of Este. The paper initially moves from the study of the funerary context to the reconstruction of the burial dynamics and the discussion of the original grave goods, whose number was probably increased once the items entered in the Museum collections. The attention is then focused on the artefacts identified as part of the original group. Except for some of them, specifically intended for the funeral celebrations, most of the items deal with the human being: there are jewels, toilette and spinning tools, games and an exotic amulet (a specimen of cypraea pantherina), together used to build up the image of the deceased. Taken from the everyday life, these artefacts highlight some aspects of the Roman world, slightly overlooked in the academic literature. Considered together, they show us the identity of the deceased, perhaps a marriageable young lady, even in the absence of the human remains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.011
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRivista di ArcheologiaSame topicAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and HistoryFrench-language works237,207