Magnetoencephalography resting state connectivity patterns as indicatives of surgical outcome in epilepsy patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Focal epilepsy is a disorder affecting several brain networks; however, epilepsy surgery usually targets a restricted region, the so-called epileptic focus. There is a growing interest in embedding resting state (RS) connectivity analysis into pre-surgical workup. APPROACH: In this retrospective study, we analyzed Magnetoencephalography (MEG) long-range RS functional connectivity patterns in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. MEG recorded prior to surgery from seven seizure-free (Engel Ia) and five non seizure-free (Engel III or IV) patients were analyzed (minimum 2-years post-surgical follow-up). MEG segments without any detectable epileptic activity were source localized using wavelet-based Maximum Entropy on the Mean method. Amplitude envelope correlation in the theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), and beta (13-26 Hz) bands were used for assessing connectivity. MAIN RESULTS: For seizure-free patients, we found an isolated epileptic network characterized by weaker connections between the brain region where interictal epileptic discharges (IED) are generated and the rest of the cortex, when compared to connectivity between the corresponding contralateral homologous region and the rest of the cortex. Contrarily, non seizure-free patients exhibited a widespread RS epileptic network characterized by stronger connectivity between the IED generator and the rest of the cortex, in comparison to the contralateral region and the cortex. Differences between the two seizure outcome groups concerned mainly distant long-range connections and were found in the alpha-band. SIGNIFICANCE: Importantly, these connectivity patterns suggest specific mechanisms describing the underlying organization of the epileptic network and were detectable at the individual patient level, supporting the prospect use of MEG connectivity patterns in epilepsy to predict post-surgical seizure outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".