Bibliographic record
Abstract
Postulant que l’antiracisme participe de l’action, qu’il est toujours un travail à mener contre une inclinaison sociale (collective ou individuelle) à construire ou à choisir une cible (sans ôter à ce phénomène ses ancrages socio-historiques, culturels et politiques précis), nous conviendrons qu’il fait en cela obstacle, qu’il est littéralement résistant : il est force à valeur intensive et contraire qui s’énonce, se montre, est transmise. Ce numéro d’Alternative francophone s’ouvre sur deux œuvres de l’artiste montréalais Stanley Février qui en donnent en quelque sorte le signal de dissonance : les deux images sont celles de moments de ruptures performées qui, par définition et conséquence, font allégorie en montrant autre chose que ce qu’elles disent, un après-coup, tout en permettant la fulgurance de ce qui est capté au présent. Cette chair, acquise par l'institution cet été 2019, est l'une des premières pièces créées par un artiste noir à entrer au Musée des beaux-arts de Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".