MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010860352 · doi:10.1175/jpo-d-20-0024.1

Winds, Waves, and Turbulence on a Shallow Continental Shelf during Passage of a Tropical Storm

2020· article· en· W3010860352 on OpenAlexaff
Ann E. Gargett, Dana K. Savidge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Oceanography · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Waves and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsNorth Pacific Marine Science Organization
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyTurbulenceStormContinental shelfSignificant wave heightEyeAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyWind waveOceanographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Measurements of collocated fields of atmospheric forcing, surface waves, and mean and turbulent velocities associated with passage of Tropical Storm (TS) Barry over the U.S. Navy Tower R2 on the Georgia continental shelf are presented. A vertical-beam ADCP enables computation of directional surface wave spectra and hence of directional Stokes functions of depth and time, as well as mean (including tidal) and turbulent velocities throughout the water column. Full-depth turbulent velocity and backscatter structures observed during TS Barry are determined to be Langmuir supercells (LS). The LS appear in the present observations and in similar observations from a shallower site only when a surface growth rate g * exceeds a critical value, providing a means of predicting how deep an unstratified water column must be before LS will not be expected. When observed, LS structures at Tower R2 are less organized than archetypical LS structures: we suggest that this result is due primarily to smaller near-bottom growth rate in the deeper water column. Despite g * values above the critical value, and appropriate values of Langmuir and Rayleigh numbers, full-depth velocity/backscatter structures disappear completely for a time between the two wind maxima associated with the TS, as wind veers rapidly clockwise with eye passage to the west of Tower R2. From the observations, the most likely explanation for this hiatus is decreased wave breaking during the period of wind veering, reducing surface supply of “effective” vertical vorticity that dominates generation of Langmuir circulation (LC). This result has significant implications for LES modeling of LC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical OceanographySame topicOcean Waves and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207