MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010912062 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2020-0028

Atomic parameters of Hf XLVIII, Ta XLIX, Os LII, Pt LIV, and Au LV

2020· article· en· W3010912062 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huang Dan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsQuadrupoleAtomic physicsQuadrupole magnetDipoleAb initioMagnetic dipoleRadiative transferElectric dipole momentQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ab initio multi-configuration Dirac–Fock (MCDF) calculations are performed for energy levels and lifetimes of the lowest 115 fine-structure levels generated from the 3s 2 3p 6 3d 7 , 3s 2 3p 5 3d 8 , 3s3p 6 3d 8 , 3s 2 3p 4 3d 9 , and 3s3p 5 3d 9 configurations of Hf XLVIII, Ta XLIX, Os LII, Pt LIV, and Au LV of fusion interest. Furthermore, radiative rates are calculated for all electric dipole, electric quadrupole, magnetic dipole, and magnetic quadrupole transitions. Electron correlation is treated through multi-configuration expansions in the active space approximation. The Breit interaction and the leading quantum electrodynamic corrections, in the form of self-energy and vacuum polarization, are included. Another theoretical attempt, based on the Flexible Atomic Code, is presented for the atomic structure to serve as an independent check of the MCDF values and the results show fairly good agreement with the MCDF ones. Comparisons are made with available results in the literature. The uncertainties of our energies and strong transition rates are found to be approximately 0.25% and 2%, respectively. The extended and consistent data presented in this study should be of notable interest in various fusion research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207