MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010925534

EARLY DEATHS IN PEDIATRIC ACUTE LEUKEMIA: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

2013· article· en· W3010925534 on OpenAlexaffabout
Susanna Y. Cheng, Jason D. Pole, Lillian Sung

Bibliographic record

VenueQueensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesPediatric Oncology GroupUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyeloid leukemiaIncidence (geometry)PediatricsRetrospective cohort studyAcute leukemiaPopulationLeukemiaLymphoblastic LeukemiaCohortInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose was to describe the incidence and risk factors associated with early deaths (≤ 42 days from diagnosis) among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in Ontario, Canada. The data source for this population-based, retrospective cohort study was the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System (POGONIS). Patients with acute leukemia aged ≤ 18 years diagnosed between 1990 and 2010 were included. The study population consisted of 1954 children with ALL and 403 with AML. The early death rate was 40/2357 (1.7%), with 1.1% of patients with ALL and 4.7% of patients with AML dying early. Among all 442 deaths recorded, 9.0% occurred early. Twelve/40 (30.0%) early deaths were attributed to infection. Factors associated with early deaths were AML (p < 0.0001) and age ≥ 10 years at diagnosis (p = 0.038). Future interventions to improve survival may consider focusing on the early treatment period and may target AML and older patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQueensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)Same topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207