MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010969360 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10500819.1

Sustainable Research on World Potassium Resource Trade Based on Complex Network Theory

2019· article· en· W3010969360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rui Kong, Mingyue Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational tradeResource (disambiguation)Distribution (mathematics)Trade barrierFree tradeBusinessOrder (exchange)International economicsEconomicsComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a national strategic resource, trade activities of potassium resources(K) have changed its state of ownership. Futures and spot trading forms in the international market are mainly primary processed ore and deep-processed products. So, K trade can be replaced by the potassium salt trade. Its international trade will affect a country’s strategic resource management, and increase national resource security risks. Thence, it is necessary to study the evolution of international trade in K. This paper has constructed a weighted and directed complex network model of K trade using UN Comtrade 2000-2016 data and analyzed the scale and activity of international trade of K, trade relations, trade flow distribution and the importance of countries. By analyzing the international trade data of K in 224 countries, it is found that trade is active year by year and K is becoming more significant. From network density and diameter, resource allocation is more convenient. The network cluster is growing. It shows that some countries form trade groups. The correlation coefficient of degrees is less than 0, indicating that the trade relationship between small and major trade countries is enhancing. And, the reciprocal coefficient is between 0.1 and 0.35, showing that the trade order is poor. Moreover, it presents a state that the greater the country’s degree, the smaller the difference in trade flow distribution. So, resource flows in countries with more trade relations can promote a balanced distribution of K. Finally, from countries’ trade influence and hub status, Canada is a leading trade country, and the US, the Russian Federation, China and Brazil are trade-led countries. They are the main source of K flows. China, the Netherlands, the US, France and India are important hubs. So, countries should strengthen bilateral trade relations. So as to ensure the SD of international trade in K, major trading countries should focus on the exploit of K and improve the level of production and processing tech. Countries should also enhance their hub role to facilitate the flow of K. China, as a large country in agriculture and K demand, should increase self-sufficiency to reduce import dependence risks. Besides, attention should be paid to market changes in major trading countries and to reducing risks by adding the number of trade countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207