MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3011042941 · doi:10.1086/512857

Far-Infrared Detection of H <sub>2</sub> D <sup>+</sup> toward Sgr B2

2007· article· en· W3011042941 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMean kinetic temperatureSpectral lineLine (geometry)InfraredLine-of-sightAbsorption (acoustics)Absorption spectroscopyEmission spectrumFar infrared

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the first far-IR detection of H 2 D + , using the Infrared Space Observatory , in the line of sight toward Sgr B2 in the Galactic center. The transition at λ = 126.853 μm connecting the ground level of o-H 2 D + , 1 1, 1 , with the 2 1, 2 level at 113 K is observed in absorption against the continuum emission of the cold dust of the source. The line is broad, with a total absorption covering 350 km s -1 , i.e., similar to that observed in the fundamental transitions of H 2 O, OH, and CH at ~179, 119, and 149 μm, respectively. For the physical conditions of the different absorbing clouds, the H 2 D + column density ranges from 2 to 5 × 10 13 cm -2 , i.e., near an order of magnitude below the upper limits obtained from ground-based submillimeter telescopes. The derived H 2 D + abundance is of a few times 10 -10 , which agrees with chemical model predictions for a gas at a kinetic temperature of ≃20 K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→