MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011091070 · doi:10.33085/jbk.v3i1.4078

Faktor yang Memengaruhi Bendungan ASI pada Ibu Nifas di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Rambung Merah Kabupaten Simalungun

2020· article· id· W3011091070 on OpenAlexaff
Sri Juliani, Nurrahmaton Nurrahmaton

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Bidan Komunitas · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicinePhysicsObstetrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendahuluan: Bendungan ASI yang disebabkan oleh pengeluaran air susu yang tidak lancar, karena bayi tidak cukup sering menyusu pada ibunya. Data SDKI tahun 2015 menyebutkan bahwa terdapat ibu nifas yang mengalami Bendungan ASI sebanyak 35.985 atau (15,60 %) ibu nifas. Tujuan: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui factor yang berpengaruh terhadap bendungan ASI di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Rambung Merah Kabupaten Simalungun. Metode: Desain penelitian survey analitik kuantitatif dengan pendekatan cross sectional dengan populasi sebanyak 122 ibu nifas dan sampel sebanyak 92 responden dengan teknik accidental sampling, analisis data menggunakan analisis univariat, bivariat dan multivariat dengan uji regresi logistik. Hasil: Diperoleh hasil penelitian bahwa seluruh variabel independen mempengaruhi bendungan ASI dengan nilai p-value < 0,05, dan berdasarkan hasil uji regresi logistik yang paling memengaruhi kejadian bendungan ASI adalah frekuensi menyusui dengan nilai sig. p = 0,000<0,25 dan nilai B (logaritma natural) terbesar yaitu 3,740. Kesimpulan: Diperoleh kesimpulan ada pengaruh frekuensi menyusui dengan kejadian bendungan ASI. Diharapkan kepada petugas puskesmas agar lebih peduli dan meningkatkan informasi manajemen laktasi dan perawatan payudara dalam mencegah kejadian bendungan ASI pada ibu nifas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Bidan KomunitasSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207