Oral health, impact of pain in the life and perception of users atended at family health strategy of Piraí-RJ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: to identify the characteristics of the demands for emergency services related to pain in health units in the city of Piraí, Rio de Janeiro; the degree of satisfaction and the perceptions of users about the service provided when the need is linked to emergency situations related to dental pain. Methods: Users of public health units answered, between May 2013 and November 2014, through questionnaires, data regarding sex, age, monthly family income, economic class, experiences in emergency services and a McGill pain questionnaire validated for the Portuguese language. The data were analyzed descriptively and using the Chi-square test (p<0.05). Results: 137 users were included (40.22 ± 15.74 years), 73.7% female, 59.9% from class C and 43.8% with an income between ½ and 1 minimum wage. Of the total, 54% felt some painrelated to oral problems in the last 12 months before the questionnaire and of these, 71.6% were seen at the service, 58% did not find it difficult to get care, 68.9% solved the problem and 73% were satisfied with the service provided. Only 37.2% of users did not report social damage at work or at leisure caused by dental pain. The age group was associated with pain related to oral problems in the last 12 months (p=0.02) and theneed for emergency consultations in the same period (p=0.005). Conclusions: The majority of individuals who are attended in public service being female, the economic class and the predominant family income were, respectively, class C and of ½ to 1 minimum wage; Toothache and pain when drinking cold or hot liquids were the most common complaints in the last 12 months; There is an association between age and presence of dental pain and the need for urgent treatment; and participants in this study are considered to have been satisfactorily treated in most cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".