MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011200270 · doi:10.1002/stc.2551

CrackU‐net: A novel deep convolutional neural network for pixelwise pavement crack detection

2020· article· en· W3011200270 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Control and Health Monitoring · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceNet (polyhedron)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial neural networkMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Periodic road crack monitoring is an essential procedure for effective pavement management. Highly efficient and accurate crack measurements are key research topics in both academia and industry. Automatic methods gradually replaced traditional manual surveys for more reliable evaluation outputs and better efficiency, whereas the devices are not available to all functional classes of pavements and different departments considering the high cost versus the limited budget. Recently, the widespread use of smartphones and digital cameras made it possible to collect pavement surface crack images at an affordable price in easier ways. However, the qualities of these crack images are diversely influenced by the noises from pavement background, roadways, and so forth. Thus, traditional methods usually fail to extract accurate crack information from pavement images. Therefore, this research proposes a state-of-the-art pixelwise crack detection architecture called CrackU-net, which is featured by its utilization of advanced deep convolutional neural network technology. CrackU-net achieved pixelwise crack detection through convolution, pooling, transpose convolution, and concatenation operations, forming the “U”-shaped model architecture. The model is trained and validated by 3,000 pavement crack images, in which 2,400 for training and 600 for validating, using the Adam algorithm. CrackU-net has the performance of loss = 0.025, accuracy = 0.9901, precision = 0.9856, recall = 0.9798, and F-measure = 0.9842 with learning rate of 10−2. Meanwhile, the false-positive crack detection problem is avoided in CrackU-net. Therefore, CrackU-net outperforms both traditional approaches and fully convolutional network (FCN) and U-net for pixelwise crack detections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it