Effects of radiation exposure on dermal collagen: A multi modal approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intense pulsed light (IPL) is a high-intensity treatment for skin disorders and ageing. As this treatment regime is often poorly regulated and inadequately studied, we investigate IPL as a cosmetic device and its effects on dermal collagen components of the skin. Biopsies from the back-neck folds of a 4-week-old, 25 kg large white pig were irradiated with intense pulsed light (IPL) (l= 584 nm) at an increased radiation dose of 40 J/cm2 once, thrice and ten times. Samples were cryo-sectioned (10 μm) and stained with picro sirrus red. Ex-vivo biopsies were assessed with polarized light microscopy (PLM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning acoustic microscopy. Customized software was used to map the sound speed and attenuation on the ultrasonic images Differences in collagen structure were observed between all three levels of irradiation progressing depth-wise into the epidermis. Ex-vivo porcine tissue demonstrated loss of D-banding and gelatinization with increasing dermal depth with higher intensities. Acoustic microscopy demonstrated a significant decrease in sound speed and attenuation that relates to the number of exposures. Sound speed decreases at much faster rates than attenuation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".