MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Results of an interim analysis of a multinational randomized, double-blind, phase III study in patients (pts) with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving FOLFOX4 and PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK) or placebo (CONFIRM 2)

2006· article· en· W3011210265 on OpenAlexaff
C. Koehne, E. Bajetta, E. Lin, Eric Van Cutsem, J. Randolph Hecht, Jean‐Yves Douillard, Malcolm J. Moore, Colin Germond, Christian Jacques

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineColorectal cancerClinical endpointIrinotecanPlaceboBevacizumabInterim analysisAdverse effectProgression-free survivalOncologyGastroenterologyCancerChemotherapyRandomized controlled trialPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3508 Background: PTK/ZK is a novel, oral, small molecule, antiangiogenic compound that inhibits tyrosine kinase signaling of all known vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors. Methods: 855 pts were randomized to FOLFOX4 plus PTK/ZK (1250 mg, qd), or placebo. Eligibility included histologically or cytologically documented mCRC, pretreatment for metastatic disease with irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, measurable disease by RECIST, PS of 0–2 and adequate organ and bone marrow function. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included OS and PFS in high LDH pts (stratifiedbybaseline serum LDH levels > 1.5 × ULN). Results: OS was 12.1 mo in the PTK/ZK arm and 11.8 mo in the placebo arm (HR: 0.94; p=0.511). A pre-planned triangular test suggested a low probability of demonstrating an improvement in OS at the final analysis (4Q 2006). The response rates (CR+PR) were 18.5% in the PTK/ZK arm, 17.5% in the placebo arm. PFS was significantly longer in the PTK/ZK arm (5.5 mo vs. 4.1 mo; HR: 0.83; p=0.026). LDH, usually a poor prognostic factor in mCRC, is predictive of the outcome in the PTK/ZK arm. Pts with high LDH showed a strong improvement in PFS when treated with PTK/ZK (5.6 mo vs. 3.8 mo; HR: 0.63; p<0.001) and an improved OS (9.6 mo vs. 7.5 mo; HR: 0.78; p=0.10). Adverse events (AE) were similar to that of the CONFIRM 1 trial (ASCO 2005). Most frequent grade 3/4 AE associated with PTK/ZK were hypertension (PTK/ZK: 21%; placebo: 5%), diarrhea (16%; 8%), fatigue (14.5%; 6.9%), nausea (11%; 5%), vomiting (9%; 5%), dizziness (9%; 1%). AEs were generally reversible. Thrombotic and embolic events of all grades occurred in 6% (PTK/ZK) vs. 1% (placebo) and 4% vs. 1%, respectively. There was no increase in bowel perforations, hematological toxicities or peripheral neuropathy in the PTK/ZK arm. Conclusions: While the primary endpoint for OS was not met, PTK/ZK improves PFS significantly in the overall population, and shows strong activity in patients with high baseline serum LDH. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207