MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011226707 · doi:10.4209/aaqr.2020.01.0018

Impact of SO2 Emission on the Gross Domestic Product Growth of China

2020· article· en· W3011226707 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Juan Xu, Ya-Hui Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueAerosol and Air Quality Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesAnhui Provincial Department of EducationHangzhou Dianzi UniversityWilfrid Laurier UniversityNational Bureau of Statistics of ChinaZhongnan University of Economics and Law
KeywordsGross domestic productChinaPer capitaEconomicsVector autoregressionPanel dataReal gross domestic productProduct (mathematics)PollutantAgricultural economicsEconometricsMacroeconomicsGeographyChemistryEnvironmental healthMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applying a structural panel vector autoregression (VAR) model to panel datasets for 108 cities between 2000 and 2015, we evaluate the effect of SO2 on China’s gross domestic product (GDP) growth by calculating the costs associated with this pollutant and its health effects. The results indicate that SO2 emissions promote GDP growth on a national scale but exhibit high regional heterogeneity in terms of cost. Specifically, although the costs exceed 20% in central China, implying that this environmental pollution contributes more than one-fifth of the GDP, and equal approximately 5% in western China, they have already begun to hinder economic growth in the eastern part of the nation. We also find that the health costs total approximately 2%, 3%, and 1% of the GDP per capita for the eastern, central, and western regions, respectively, revealing that rapid economic growth has been achieved at the expense of health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAerosol and Air Quality ResearchSame topicEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207