Water mould exposure induces enzymatic antioxidant defences in embryos of the Two-colored Oval Frog (<i>Elachistocleis bicolor</i>) (Anura: Microhylidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water moulds are pathogens of amphibian eggs and embryos. However, little is known about oxidant or antioxidant status of amphibians in response to stress caused by water moulds. We exposed embryo stages of Two-colored Oval Frogs (Elachistocleis bicolor (Guérin-Méneville, 1838)) to a Saprolegnia-like species of water mould to explore homeostatic adjustments by the shifting of oxidative stress markers. We also tested whether water mould infection affected survivorship, hatching time, and morphology of hatching embryos. We found that the Saprolegnia-like species is a genuine stressor and substantially altered the physiological state of E. bicolor embryos. Among antioxidant defences, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities increased in embryos exposed to the Saprolegnia-like species. However, no difference in lipid peroxidation levels was found between treatments, which might indicate that SOD and GST activations could be enough to prevent oxidative damage. Finally, we found higher mortality and number of malformations in the water mould treatment. We showed the stressful effect of water moulds on amphibian embryos, evidenced by the activation of their antioxidant system, and reveal the importance of considering physiological stress markers as key information when studying the potential consequences of disease outbreaks in the ecology and conservation of amphibians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".